Latimer v. Latimer
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Witherspoon, J., Greenville, April, 1894. Petition by George G. Wells and James L. Orr, late partners as attorneys at law, under the firm name of Wells & Orr, in the cases of Sullivan v. Parkins and Latimer v. Latimer.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Pope.
It seems that Hewlett Sullivan, as plaiutiff, recovered a judgment in the Court of Common Pleas for Greenville County, in this State, for $2,121.05 and costs, against C. A. Parkins, P. D. Huff, John H. Latimer, and James H. Latimer, as defendants. Subsequently the said Hewlett Sullivan departed this life testate, and Joseph B. Latimer and John H. Latimer qualified as the executors of bis will. There*479after James H. Latimer, as plaintiff, brought his action against the said Joseph P. Latimer and John H. Latimer, as executors of the will…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Puett v. BeardIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Perry v. . ChesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Ely v. . CookeNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
- Herman v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
- Ames v. BatesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
3Cited by7 opinions
- Riley Ex Rel. Estate of Riley v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2015
- Ex Parte HiersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
- Eleazer v. Hardaway Concrete Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
- Black v. B. B. Kirkland Seed Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
- J. L. Owens Co. v. OfficerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1917
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.