Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Ling-Temco-Vought, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 20, 1970No. Civ. A. No. 69-438Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROSENBERG, District Judge.

Presently before me for consideration is the Motion of the defendants, LingTemco-Vought, Inc. and Jones & Laughlin Industries, Inc. for the production of documents under Rule 34 of our Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.1 By this mo*151tion, the defendants seek to obtain a vast quantity of information from investigations conducted over a long period of time by various agencies of the United States Government concerning, amongst other things, reciprocity and competitive products in the steel industry, as well as of merger movements and concentration of assets in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. W. Lamonte Robison, Trustee of Beehive Security Thrift & Loan v. Transamerica Insurance Co., and Firemans Fund Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
  3. Hecht v. Pro-Football, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1969
  4. Hendricks Johannes Volkenburg, P.P.A. v. Nederland-Amerik. Stoomv. MaatsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1964
  5. KS Corp. v. Chemstrand CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API