Legal Opinion

KS Corp. v. Chemstrand Corporation

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 19, 1962PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PALMIERI, District Judge.

Defendant The Chemstrand Corporation (Chemstrand) has moved for an order sustaining its objections to certain interrogatories propounded by plaintiff in a private treble damage action against Chemstrand, a manufacturer of synthetic fibers, and Fabrex Corp. (Fabrex), a competing converter. The complaint contains three causes of action, two of which are relevant to the instant motion. The first charges that defendant Chemstrand violated section 2 of the Clayton Act, as amended by the Robinson-Patman Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 13, by its refusal to grant plaintiff advertising,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Federal Trade Commission v. Simplicity Pattern Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Simplicity Pattern Co., Inc., a Corporation v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Maritime Cinema Service Corp. v. Movies En Route, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1973
  2. Midland Investment Co. v. Van Alstyne, Noel & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1973
  3. Dolgow v. AndersonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1971
  4. United States v. Ling-Temco-Vought, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API