Legal Opinion

White v. White

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 1920PublishedCited by 14 opinions

• From Linn: Percy R. Kelly, Judge. In Bane. This is a suit by Berta K. White against D. C. White for divorce. Pending appeal by defendant from a decree in favor of plaintiff, the respondent files motion in the Supreme Court for suit and maintenance money. Rule 8 of Supreme Court requiring printed briefs relaxed, and respondent allowed to file typewritten briefs.

1Opinion of the CourtMcBRIDE, C. J.

This is a motion for additional suit money and maintenance daring the pendency of an appeal.

1. The plaintiff sued for a divorce, and obtained from the Circuit Court an order for $60 suit money pending the hearing, which was exhausted in the payment of witness fees and expenses of the trial. She was granted a decree, from which defendant appealed to this court, where the cause is now pending. The affidavit shows that she is practically destitute of means to print briefs, or pay her attorneys, or even maintain herself, pending the trial here; but, as shown in O’Brien v. O’Brien, 36 Or. 92 (57…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. MagersOregon Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Ferguson v. RayOregon Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Crumbley v. CrumbleyOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Wheeler v. WheelerOregon Supreme Court · 1889
  5. O'Brien v. O'BrienOregon Supreme Court · 1899

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Edwards v. EdwardsOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Thomsen v. ThomsenOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Fuller v. FullerOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Baier v. BaierOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Billion v. BillionOregon Supreme Court · 1931

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API