Legal Opinion
Spectralytics, Inc. v. Cordis Corp.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided November 30, 2011No. Case No. 05-CV-1464 (PJS/LIB)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AFTER REMAND
PATRICK J. SCHILTZ, District Judge.
This matter was tried to a jury, which found that defendants Cordis Corporation (“Cordis”) and Norman Noble, Inc. (“Noble”) 1 willfully infringed United States Patent No. 5,852,277 (the '277 patent). The '277 patent is owned by plaintiff Spectralytics, Inc. and covers an apparatus for cutting a piece of metal tubing with a laser to make a stent. The jury awarded Spectralytics $22.35 million in compensatory damages for Cordis’s infringement.
After trial, Cordis moved for judgment as a matter of law or, in the alternative, a new trial. The…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- The Read Corporation and F.T. Read & Sons, Inc. v. Portec, Inc., D/B/A Portec/kolberg DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- I4i Ltd. Partnership v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Underwater Devices Incorporated v. Morrison-Knudsen Company, Inc., Morrison-Knudsen Company, Inc. v. Lester A. Haug, Don W. Schmid and Herman GuntherCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Laitram Corporation, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Nec Corporation and Nec Technologies Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- SRI International, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2017
- VirnetX Inc. v. Apple Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2017