Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

CIGANA CORP. v. Spears

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided September 21, 1992No. 04-92-00153-CVPublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON RELATORS’ MOTION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

CHAPA, Justice.

This is an original proceeding in which relator, Cigna Corporation and its subsidiaries, seeks this court to protect its attorney-client and attorney work product privileges in discovery proceedings.

The underlying lawsuit was instituted by Tom McCorkle, an independent insurance agent, against Cigna for breach of contract. McCorkle alleged that Cigna induced him to enter its COMPAR program by which McCorkle became an exclusive insurance salesman for Cigna. McCorkle claimed that after he joined the COMPAR program Cigna cancelled the program.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Johnson v. Fourth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Jampole v. TouchyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  5. West v. SolitoTexas Supreme Court · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. In Re EI DuPont De Nemours and Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. In Re Monsanto Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1999
  3. El Centro Del Barrio, Inc. v. Barlow, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1994
  4. First Union Nat. Bank v. TurneyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  5. Volcanic Gardens Management Co. v. Paxson, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1993

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API