Legal Opinion

Gittelson v. Gandolfo

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 6, 1928No. Docket No. 5121PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WOOD (W. J.), J., pro tem.

Plaintiff filed this action to recover fees claimed to have been earned in the negotiation of the sale of defendant’s real estate. He alleges in his complaint “that the defendant employed the plaintiff herein as her agent to negotiate a sale or secure a purchaser for the premises . . . described as lot 8, block 52, etc.” Then follow the allegations customary in actions of this kind prior to the enactment of the Real Estate Broker’s Act of 1919. In the answer defendant denies these allegations and in addition thereto sets forth that she was induced to sign the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Riley v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Haas v. GreenwaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Beebe v. KistlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Silverberg v. BaumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API