Legal Opinion
Chilcutt Direct Marketing, Inc. v. a Carroll Corp.
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided May 7, 2010No. 106,961. Released for Publication by Order of the Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 4PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOUG GABBARD II, Presiding Judge.
T1 Plaintiff, Chileutt Direct Marketing, Ine. (CDM), appeals the trial court's denial of its motion for new trial following the court's overruling of its motion for an injunction under the Trade Secrets Act. For the following reasons, we affirm.
FACTS
12 The parties involved in this appeal are two direct marketing companies that are competitors, CDM and Defendant A Carroll Corporation (ACC). Defendant James D. Hall, Jr., worked for CDM for 21 years. He resigned in 2006 to work for ACC, telling CDM he would be selling software programs to doctors. He received…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- A & H Sportswear Inc. Mainstream Swimsuits, Inc. v. Victoria's Secret Stores, Inc. Victoria's Secret Catalogue, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Carpenter v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Mueggenborg v. WallingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Sharp v. 251st Street Landfill, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Amoco Production Co. v. LindleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- PROGRESSIVE PRODUCTS, INC. v. SwartzSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
- Traditions Health, LLC v. HuffmanDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2024