Legal Opinion

State v. Bauberger

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 15, 2006No. 172A06PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Justice WAINWRIGHT took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See State v. Harrison, 360 N.C. 394, 627 S.E.2d 461 (2006); Crawford v. Commercial Union Midwest Ins. Co., 356 N.C. 609, 572 S.E.2d 781 (2002); Robinson v. Byrd, 356 N.C. 608, 572 S.E.2d 781 (2002).

AFFIRMED.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Crawford v. COMMERCIAL UNION MIDWEST INS. COM.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  2. Robinson v. ByrdSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  3. State v. HarrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bauberger v. HaynesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
  2. State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  3. State v. PatinoCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  4. Bauberger v. HaynesDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2009
  5. Bauberger v. HaynesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API