Legal Opinion
Valerio v. Dahlberg
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided March 31, 1989No. C2-85-2027PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GEORGE C. SMITH, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendants’ limited motion for summary judg ment. For the reasons set forth below the motion is granted in part and denied in part, and certain causes of action are dismissed by the Court.
I. BACKGROUND
A.Parties
The plaintiff, Karen Valerio, alleges various causes of action based upon employment discrimination by defendants Eric Dahlberg, Robert Prigmore, the Ohio State Reformatory, and the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction. Valerio was employed as a technical typist beginning in 1972. Dahlberg is…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kanzler v. RennerWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
- Henderson v. Corrections Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1996
- Win-Tex Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1993
- Hubbard v. City of MiddletownDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1990
- Demetra Lyree Parker v. Warren County Utility DistrictCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.