Legal Opinion

Harris v. City of Rome

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 15, 1912No. 3558PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Action for damages; from city court of Floyd county — Judge Eeece.

1Opinion of the CourtBussell, J.

The present case is distinguished by its facts from Mayor &c. of Dalton v. Wilson, 118 Ga. 100 (44 S. E. 830, 98 Am. St. R. 101). In that case a ditch on private propertjr contained the obstruction that caused the injury; and the owner of the hotel, from which the sewer extended into the ditch, controlled the hotel, sewer, ditch, obstruction, and pond, and was consequently responsible for the nuisance. Neither the nuisance nor its cause was under the control of the city, nor on city property. In the ease at bar the petition, with the amendments, alleged, that the nuisance was created by the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mayor of Dalton v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Turk v. City of RomeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  2. City of Rome v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  3. Autry v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  4. City of Rome v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  5. City of Rome v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API