Legal Opinion

City of Rome v. Harris

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 24, 1914No. 5777Published

Action for damages; from city court of Floyd county—Judge Reece. May 5, 1914.

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, C. J.

This is the third appearance of this case before this court. See 10 Ga. App. 409 (73 S. E. 532); 12 Ga. App. 756 (78 S. E. 475). On the first hearing we held that the petition of Mrs. Harris set out a good cause of action; and after a trial before a jury, the decision of the trial judge refusing a new trial was reversed solely on account of improper argument of counsel for the plaintiff. No technical error of any kind is alleged in the present exceptions, the City of Rome seeking a reversal of the judgment overruling its motion for new trial solely upon the usual general grounds, that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Rome v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  2. Harris v. City of RomeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API