Legal Opinion

City of Rome v. Harris

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 10, 1913No. 4733PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Action for damages; from city court of Floyd county—Judge Reece. January 31, 1913.

1Opinion of the CourtPottle, J.

Mrs. Harris sued the City of Rome for damages for an illness caused by a pond of stagnant water which had been allowed by the city to accumulate upon the property of the plaintiff’s husband, on which she resided. A judgment sustaining a general demurrer to the petition was reversed by this court. Harris *757v. Rome, 10 Ga. App. 409 (73 S. E. 532). On the trial the plaintiff obtained a verdict for damages. There was little or no conflict in the evidence in reference to the negligence of the defendant in permitting the pond of water to accumulate and remain on the premises where the plaintiff…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sexton v. Greensboro Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  2. City of Sandersville v. StanleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
  3. Harris v. City of RomeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brown v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  2. Fitzgerald v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  3. Loughridge v. City of DaltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
  4. Emerson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
  5. Smith v. Hilton & Dodge Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API