Legal Opinion
Davis v. Seneca Falls Mfg. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided February 7, 1927No. 92PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANTON, Circuit Judge.
Equity receivers were appointed in the above suit for the conservation of the property and assets of the Seneca Palls Manufacturing Company. A special master was appointed to take proof, ascertain, and report to the court the nature and extent of the claims and liens against the defendant. Creditors were required to file their claims, and, among these, the Merchants’ Bank of Rochester filed its claim for $85,000, Grossman for $26,600,- and Ruth M. Adams for $10,100. These claims were objected to. Proofs were taken before, the master, and he reported, holding that these…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Geddes v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Dean v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Corsicana Nat. Bank of Corsicana v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Robertson v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Billings v. . RussellNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Wallace v. FiskeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
- In Re New York InvestorsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
- In Re Paramount Publix CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
- Sartorius v. BardoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
- Simmons v. FridayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.