Legal Opinion
Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Vigil
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided April 20, 1936No. 4085PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SADLER, Chief Justice.
This appeal is before us on rehearing. We reach the same result as announced by the opinion heretofore handed down. The result resting upon another ground of invalidity, however, than that advanced in the former opinion, said opinion is hereby withdrawn and the following substituted therefor:
Safeway Stores, Inc., J. C. Penney Company, Montgomery Ward & Co., and S. H. Kress & Co. have separately sued to enjoin operation of Laws 1933, c. 73, and Laws 1934, Sp.Sess., c. 33, each of which acts requires a permit to engage in business as a retail dealer in merchandise, and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- F. S. Royster Guano Co. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Dorchy v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Hill v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- The Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Bradbury & Stamm Construction Co. v. Bureau of RevenueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
- Burch v. FoyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1957
- Gruschus Ex Rel. Estate of Adams v. Bureau of RevenueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
- Michael J. Maloof & Co. v. Bureau of RevenueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
- Rust Tractor Co. v. Bureau of RevenueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.