Legal Opinion

Brenman v. Demello

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 30, 2007PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rivera-Soto

This appeal presents a single issue germane to automobile accident cases: whether expert testimony is required as a condi*21tion precedent to the admission of photographs of vehicle damage when the cause or extent of a plaintiffs injuries are at issue.

We answer that question in the negative. The admissibility of any relevant photograph rests on whether the photograph fairly and accurately depicts what it purports to represent, an evidentiary decision that properly lies in the trial court’s discretion. We reject a per se rule that requires expert testimony as a foundation for the admissibility of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. TorresSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
  2. Green v. New Jersey Manufacturers InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  3. State v. TownsendSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
  4. Bender v. AdelsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
  5. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. Estate of Hanges v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
  2. Hisenaj v. KuehnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
  3. State v. RoseSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
  4. State v. BurnsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
  5. State v. Kingkamau NantambuSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2015

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API