Legal Opinion

State v. Kingkamau Nantambu

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 29, 2015No. A-97-13PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Solomon

In this interlocutory appeal, we address the admissibility of a recorded conversation where a portion of the conversation was inadvertently omitted from the recording. The recording in question is a phone conversation between defendant Kingkamau Nan- tambu and his girlfriend, Crystal Aikens. It was made during a police investigation into allegations by Aikens that defendant had engaged in witness tampering related to a prior indictment for weapons offenses. The recording was interrupted when the recording device fell to the ground, causing the wires to disconnect and the device to shut off.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
  2. State v. FrostSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  3. State v. BrownSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
  4. State v. WakefieldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
  5. State v. DriverSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Lee v. BrownSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2018
  2. State v. Rasul McNeil-Thomas (080758) (Essex County and Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2019
  3. Rodriguez v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2019
  4. State of New Jersey v. Amie MarroccelliNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2017
  5. State of New Jersey v. Ryan J. RinkerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2016

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API