Satterfield v. Ayers
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Action for breach of warranty; from city court of Hartwell.
1Opinion of the CourtHill, C. J.
1. Where an attorney, in the argument of a ease before the
jury, uses improper language which is claimed to be prejudicial, it is the duty of the attorney for the opposite party to invoke a ruling of the trial judge thereon, either by the declaration of a mistrial or by reprimanding the off ending attorney and giving proper instructions in reference to the language so used to the jury; and where no such action is invoked, the use of the improper language can not subsequently be made a ground of a motion for a new trial. Lavender v. State, 9 Ga. App. 856 (72 S. E. 437).
2. Except as above…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Lavender v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hart v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
- Lenox Drug Co. v. New England Jewelry Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
- Southern Railway Co. v. RayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
- Ware v. LamarCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
- Hinsman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.