O'Donovan-Conlin v. United States Department of State
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
JENKINS, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Presently before the Court are Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment and Defendants’ Cross Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons discussed below, summary judgment for plaintiffs is DENIED, and summary judgment for defendants is GRANTED.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND 1
On November 28, 1980, plaintiff Neal O’Donovan-Conlin (“O’Donovan-Conlin”) was born in West Berlin, Germany, to plaintiff David Conlin III (“Conlin”), a U.S. citizen, and Heather O’Donovan, an…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Anderson v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Villegas-Sarabia v. JohnsonDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2015