Legal Opinion

Allen v. Lindeman

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 7, 1967No. 52317PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBecker, J.

Plaintiff sues defendant for alienation of af-. fections. His petition demands both compensatory and exemplary damages. Jury trial resulted in a $20,000 verdict for compensatory damages and a verdict for defendant on the issue of exemplary damages. Defendant appeals.

I. Defendant’s, first assignment of error involves the failure to direct a verdict in his favor on proper motion. He contends there is no competent evidence to establish plaintiff’s cause of action. We disagree.

For the purpose of this assignment we view the evidence in the light most favorable to plaintiff. Rule 344(f), Rules of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Castner v. WrightSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
  2. Thornbury v. MaleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
  3. Sexton v. SextonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  4. Glatstein v. GrundSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952
  5. Maland v. TesdallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Schmitt v. Jenkins Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  2. Abbey Fry v. Andrew Blauvelt D/B/A Bluefield Trust ConstructionSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
  3. City of Philadelphia v. KennyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Giltner v. StarkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  5. State Ex Rel. Leas in Interest of O'NealSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API