Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Harmon

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided May 6, 2005No. 03-P-1339PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKatzmann, J.

The defendant was convicted of being an accessory after the fact to murder.1 The case arose out of the events *457surrounding the fatal shooting of Joseph Alemesis (victim) on February 2, 2001, in Lowell. Charles Byrd pleaded guilty to murdering the victim. The defendant, on appeal, challenges the sufficiency of an affidavit for a search warrant that turned up incriminating evidence, and the trial judge’s instructions to the jury on consciousness of guilt. We affirm the judgment.

1. Sufficiency of the affidavit, a. Facts. The defendant argues that the affidavit for the search warrant failed to…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Commonwealth v. CinelliMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  3. Commonwealth v. WilsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  4. Commonwealth v. CarrionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  5. Commonwealth v. O'DayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. EscaleraMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
  2. Commonwealth v. LuthyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
  3. Commonwealth v. AnthonyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  4. Commonwealth v. MorrisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
  5. Commonwealth v. MartinezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API