Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Luthy

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided May 18, 2007No. 06-P-889PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKatzmann, J.

This case presents the question of the quantum of evidence sufficient to establish probable cause to search the residence'of the principal of a drug delivery service. A grand jury indicted the defendants, Heather Luthy and Joseph Luthy, *103on charges of trafficking in cocaine in excess of 200 grams2 and conspiracy to violate drug laws.3 The defendants filed motions to suppress evidence seized at their residence, 909 Pike Avenue, Attleboro. Following a hearing, a Superior Court judge issued a memorandum of decision allowing the defendants’ motions on the grounds that the affidavit offered to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CinelliMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  2. Commonwealth v. BeckettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  3. Commonwealth v. O'DayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
  4. Commonwealth v. BlakeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  5. Commonwealth v. DonahueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. EscaleraMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
  2. Commonwealth v. AlexisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
  3. Commonwealth v. TapiaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
  4. Commonwealth v. MendesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2010
  5. Commonwealth v. YoungMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2010

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API