Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. O'Day
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided November 7, 2003PublishedCited by 104 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCowin, J.
The defendant, Thomas J. O’Day, III, was found guilty of possession of an infernal machine in violation of G. L. c. 266, § 102A.1 He appealed from the denial of his motion to suppress evidence seized in his residence and his motion to dismiss the indictment charging possession of a grenade simulator that was destroyed by the Commonwealth prior to trial. The Appeals Court concluded that the motion to suppress should have been allowed and therefore reversed the judgment. Commonwealth v. O’Day, 56 Mass. App. Ct. 833, 840 (2002).2 We granted the Commonwealth’s application for further appellate…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Commonwealth v. UptonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- United States v. Robert Leonard LucarzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Commonwealth v. CinelliMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by104 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ConnollyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
- Commonwealth v. AugustineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
- Commonwealth v. EstabrookMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
- Commonwealth v. BarbosaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
- Commonwealth v. EscaleraMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.