Legal Opinion · Dissent

Adams v. Coleman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 29, 1963No. 40057Published

1DissentWilliams, Justice

I would join unhesitatingly and fully in the dissent of Mr. Vice Chief Justice HALLEY if, in my opinion, this Court has jurisdiction of this appeal. However, my belief is, it does not.

In the case of Application of Central Oklahoma Milk Producers Ass’n., Okl., 312 P.2d 500, this Court held that, before passing upon the merits, it should first find it has jurisdiction of an appeal, whether the question is raised by a party or not. See also the many cases set forth in 2 West’s Oklahoma Digest, Appeal and Error, *1011And, Video Independent Theatres, Inc., v. Walker, Okl., 308 P.2d 958.

The trial court…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hurley v. HurleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  2. Wagner v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  3. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Tackett v. TackettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Video Independent Theatres, Inc. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API