Legal Opinion

Clark v. Clark

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 5, 1961No. Civ. 19522PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDraper, J.

Interlocutory decree of divorce directed defendant husband to pay alimony and child support. Within six months, he moved to modify the decree by eliminating the provision for alimony. His motion was denied, and he appeals.

Defendant is a real estate salesman. His earnings are wholly from commissions. His testimony was that while his income had averaged nearly $5,500 per year for five years before the decree, it had fallen to a total of $440 in the five months preceding hearing upon his motion. He contends that the trial court acted arbitrarily in refusing to recognize that this decrease in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Leupe v. LeupeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Webber v. WebberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Woolams v. WoolamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Evans v. EvansCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Philbin v. PhilbinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  2. Levitt v. LevittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. In Re Marriage of WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API