United States v. Kuyper
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Appeal from Board, of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 36813 (T. D. 34871).
1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge
Referring to the merchandise in this case the appraiser’s answer to the protest is as follows:
The merchandise described on the invoice as vegetable albumen is, according to the chemist’s report, not vegetable albumen, but a preparation evidently of cereal *143meal, that has been treated in such a way as to get rid of much of the starch and leave mostly protein. The starch grains are so broken up in the process that it is not possible to identify it. The protein is evidently derived from wheat, corn, rye, or barley and contains 77.9 per cent protein, 10 per cent starch, and 12.1 per cent moisture…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bliven v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- United States v. Danker & MarstonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
- United States v. ReissCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Western Electric Co.United States Customs Court · 1951
- Larzelere & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
- Universal Carloading & Distributing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1943
- Maggi Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
- Maggi Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.