Legal Opinion

Universal Carloading & Distributing Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided October 9, 1943No. C. D. 805PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Keefe, Judge:

This action involves merchandise invoiced as wheat gluten, vacuum dried. It was assessed for duty as a nonenumerated manufactured article under paragraph 15S8 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The plaintiffs claim that the commodity is free of duty under paragraph 1605, as albumen, not specially provided for. By way of amendment of all of the protests herein except 54103-K it was further claimed that the merchandise was dutiable at $1.04 per hundred pounds under paragraph 729, as “wheat flour, semolina, crushed or cracked wheat, and similar wheat products * *

The paragraphs of the Tariff…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. KuyperCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Maggi Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
  2. Maggi Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API