Legal Opinion

Homans v. City of Albuquerque

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 27, 2004No. 02-2244, 02-2316PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUCERO, Circuit Judge.

In response to the increasingly apparent need to reform the ways in which political campaigns are financed, the city of Albuquerque implemented a campaign-finance reform system in 1974. It adopted limits on campaign expenditures and contributions in municipal elections. In 2001, mayoral candidate Rick Homans brought a challenge under the First and Fourteenth Amendments1 to the mayoral-candidate expenditure restriction; ruling in favor of Homans, the district court permanently enjoined enforcement of this limit. City-council candidate Sander Rue brought a similar suit…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Everson v. Board of Ed. of EwingSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Been v. O.K. Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  2. Bishop v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
  3. Kansas Judicial Review v. StoutCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  4. Petrella v. BrownbackCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
  5. United States v. FridayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API