Legal Opinion
Patton v. Kera Technology, Inc.
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided October 26, 2006No. SC05-667PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
946 So.2d 983 (2006)
Noel Thomas PATTON, et al., Petitioners,
v.
KERA TECHNOLOGY, INC., et al., Respondents.
No. SC05-667.
Supreme Court of Florida.
October 26, 2006.
Rehearing Denied December 28, 2006.
Wendy Shay Temple and Howard S. Marks of Graham, Builder, Jones, Pratt and Marks, LLP, Winter Park, FL, for Petitioners.
John S. Schoene, Maitland, Florida and Todd M. Hoepker, Orlando, FL, for Respondents.
2Per curiam
We have for review Patton v. Kera Technology, Inc., 895 So.2d 1175 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005), which expressly and directly conflicts with the decision of the First District Court of Appeal in Dye v.…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Lewis; Dissent; Concurrence · Anstead.
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Wilson v. SalamonSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
- Metropolitan Dade County v. HallSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
- Fuster-Escalona v. WisotskySupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- Lukowsky v. Hauser & Metsch, PADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- Dye v. Security Pacific Financial Services, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- Hudak v. Medical Lien Management, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2013
- Sebree v. SCHANTZ, SCHATZMAN, AARONSONDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- Weiss v. ESTATE OF COURSHONDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008