Legal Opinion

Fuster-Escalona v. Wisotsky

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided November 30, 2000No. SC93949PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

781 So.2d 1063 (2000)

Francisco FUSTER-ESCALONA, Petitioner,

v.

Steven J. WISOTSKY, et al., Respondents.

No. SC93949.

Supreme Court of Florida.

November 30, 2000.

Rehearing Denied March 21, 2001.

Francisco Fuster-Escalona, Petitioner, Indiantown, Florida, pro se.

Steven Wisotsky, Coconut Grove, Florida, pro se.

William J. Berger, Boca Raton, Florida; and Heidi F. Friedman of Panza, Maurer, Maynard & Neel, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, Florida, for Respondents.

2Per curiam

We have for review Fuster-Escalona v. Wisotsky, 715 So.2d 1053 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), which expressly and directly conflicts with the decision in Lukowsky…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Harding; Dissent; Concurrence · Lewis.

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Livingston v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  2. Cave v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  3. Toney v. FreemanSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  4. Lukowsky v. Hauser & Metsch, PADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  5. Florida Bar Re: Amendment to Florida Rules of Judicial AdministrationSupreme Court of Florida · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by26 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
  2. Wilson v. SalamonSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  3. Thompson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
  4. Tableau Fine Art Group, Inc. v. JacoboniSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
  5. NEI v. Foodtech Hialeah, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API