Legal Opinion

Lukowsky v. Hauser & Metsch, PA

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 21, 1996No. 95-2871PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

677 So.2d 1383 (1996)

Rebecca LUKOWSKY, Appellant,

v.

HAUSER & METSCH, P.A., et al., Appellees.

No. 95-2871.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

August 21, 1996.

Kenneth E. Cohen; Fried & Luceri, P.A., and Frank Luceri (Fort Lauderdale), for appellant.

Rumberger, Kirk & Caldwell and Joshua D. Lerner and Joseph M. Maus, for appellees.

Before NESBITT, JORGENSON, and GREEN, JJ.

2Per curiam

The plaintiff in a legal malpractice action appeals from an order dismissing her complaint for failure to prosecute. For the following reasons, we reverse.

While a motion for summary judgment was pending before the…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Air Line Pilots Ass'n v. SchneemilchDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

4Cited by13 opinions

  1. Fuster-Escalona v. WisotskySupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  2. Sewell Masonry Co. v. DCC Const., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  3. Dye v. Security Pacific Financial Services, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  4. Cincinnati Equitable Ins. Co. v. HawitDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  5. Patton v. Kera Technology, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API