Legal Opinion
Doe v. Geller
District Court, N.D. California
Decided February 4, 2008No. C 07-2478 VRWPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
VAUGHN R. WALKER, Chief Judge.
This dispute concerns the copyright infringement takedown provisions under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (“DMCA”). See 17 USC § 512(f) (2000). Plaintiff claims that defendants Explorologist, Ltd (“Explorologist”) and Uri Geller (“Geller”) knowingly misrepresented to the YouTube file-sharing company that one of plaintiffs video postings infringed defen dants’ copyrights. 17 USC § 512(f). Plaintiff seeks damages from the alleged misrepresentation, as well as a declaratory judgment of noninfringement. Doc # 1. Defendants respond with a motion to dismiss.…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Automattic Inc. v. SteinerDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Shropshire v. CanningDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2011
- Guzman v. Bridgepoint Education, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2015
- Lenz v. Universal Music Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2008
- Tuteur v. Crosley-CorcoranDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.