House v. American Family Mutual Insurance
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
*420The opinion of the court was delivered by
Six, J.:
This is a first-impression statutory interpretation case. The statute in question is K.S.A. 40-3110(a) (personal injury protection [PIP] benefits under no-fault auto insurance credited by workers compensation benefits paid). The crafting of a resolution requires the blending of statutory and insurance policy references to PIP payments and workers compensation benefits. Our resolution is linked to legislative intent and the language of the insurance policy.
The district court entered summary judgment for American Family Mutual Insurance Company…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Todd v. KellySupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
- Van Tassel v. Horace Mann Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Van Hoozer v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
- Patterson v. BrouhardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
- Clayton v. Alliance Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1973
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- First Financial Insurance v. BuggSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
- Scott E. McIntosh and Steven R. McIntosh v. Scottsdale Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- National Bank of Andover v. Kansas Bankers Surety Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2010
- Spivey v. Safeco InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
- Crescent Oil Co. v. Federated Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1995
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.