Legal Opinion

State ex inf. Attorney General v. Shull

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 22, 1994No. 76723PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTSON, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment of ouster entered in the circuit court following the filing of an information in the nature quo warranto by the Attorney General of Missouri charging a public officer with violating the anti-nepotism provision of article VII, section 6 of the Missouri Constitution. This Court has jurisdiction. Mo. Const, art. V, § 3. The judgment is affirmed.

I

The essential facts are undisputed though their meaning is strenuously contested. The people of Clay County, Missouri, elected Peggy Shull their presiding commissioner in November, 1990. A Republican,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  3. State Ex Inf. Atty. Gen. v. HedrickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1922
  4. State Ex Inf. McKittrick v. WymoreSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
  5. State Ex Rel. Voss v. DavisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Ex Inf. Hensley v. YoungSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  2. State v. OlveraSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
  3. Roorda v. City of ArnoldMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. State v. YothersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
  5. State ex inf. Nixon v. CorleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API