State ex inf. Attorney General v. Shull
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERTSON, Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment of ouster entered in the circuit court following the filing of an information in the nature quo warranto by the Attorney General of Missouri charging a public officer with violating the anti-nepotism provision of article VII, section 6 of the Missouri Constitution. This Court has jurisdiction. Mo. Const, art. V, § 3. The judgment is affirmed.
I
The essential facts are undisputed though their meaning is strenuously contested. The people of Clay County, Missouri, elected Peggy Shull their presiding commissioner in November, 1990. A Republican,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- State Ex Inf. Atty. Gen. v. HedrickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1922
- State Ex Inf. McKittrick v. WymoreSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
- State Ex Rel. Voss v. DavisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State Ex Inf. Hensley v. YoungSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
- State v. OlveraSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
- Roorda v. City of ArnoldMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- State v. YothersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
- State ex inf. Nixon v. CorleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.