Legal Opinion

Richfield Oil Corp. v. United States

District Court, N.D. California

Decided August 11, 1959No. 36622PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROCHE, District Judge.

This is an action by plaintiff to recover taxes alleged to have been illegally assessed and collected. The taxes in question were collected pursuant to 26 U.S.C.A. § 3460 on the transportation by plaintiff of petroleum products by pipe line during taxable periods from May 1, 1950 to March 31, 1954. The facts are not disputed. Many are contained in stipulations made in the course of a pre-trial conference, dated March 5, and Stipulations of Facts, dated July 11, 1958, both of which the court adopts. The sole question presented is whether or not the disputed movements are…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Republic Oil Refining Co. v. GrangerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
  2. United States v. Pan American Refining CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  3. Port Fuel Company v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1955
  4. Southern Minerals Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1956
  5. Pan American Refining Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1953

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cities Service Oil Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
  2. Great Lakes Pipe Line Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API