Legal Opinion

Pan American Refining Corp. v. United States

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided December 8, 1953No. Civ. No. 1475PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONNALLY, District Judge.

The action is one by Pan American Refining Corporation to recover transportation taxes assessed and collected for the years 1946, 1947, and a portion of 1948, for the transportation by plaintiff of crude oil or its products by pipe line, pursuant to Sec. 3460 of the Internal Revenue Code, Title 26, U.S.C.A. The facts, while somewhat involved, are largely without dispute. In the main, they are covered by. a full stipulation of the parties, to which I refer and which I adopt. There remains primarily for the Court the question of applying to the admitted facts the terms…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Republic Oil Refining Co. v. GrangerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
  2. McKeever v. FontenotCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
  3. Republic Oil Refining Co. v. GrangerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1951

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Pan American Refining CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  2. Richfield Oil Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1959
  3. Board of Education v. Property Tax Appeal Board of the Department of RevenueAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API