Legal Opinion

Southern Minerals Corp. v. United States

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided November 15, 1956No. Civ. A. No. 1153PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALLRED, District Judge.

This is another action for refund of petroleum transportation taxes illegally collected under 26 U.S.C.A. § 3460, similar to those involved in the Republic,1 Pan American 2 and Port Fuel Company 3 cases. The only real fact distinction is that in those cases operations within the premises of refineries were involved, while here plaintiff operates a terminal where five different grades of crude oil were received from common carrier pipe lines, blended to meet customer specifications and thereafter transported 3,600 feet through plaintiff’s lines within the terminal…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Republic Oil Refining Co. v. GrangerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
  2. United States v. Pan American Refining CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  3. Port Fuel Company v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1955

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cities Service Oil Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
  2. Richfield Oil Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1959
  3. Board of Education v. Property Tax Appeal Board of the Department of RevenueAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  4. Great Lakes Pipe Line Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API