Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Coffman

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1888PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Umatilla County.

1Opinion of the CourtSteahan, J.

This is an action to recover damages for a breach of a-building contract, signed by J. J. Goble, as principal, and D. Coffman and Thomas Nye, as sureties. It appears from the complaint that on the fourteenth day of June, 1886, the plaintiffs entered into a contract with J. J. Goble, who agreed to furnish all of the materials except brick, and perform all the work and labor in the erection of a certain building in Pendleton, Oregon, for which the plaintiffs were to pay $6,460, to be paid in various amounts as the work progressed. To secure the faithful performance of said contract on the part…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Belloni v. . FreebornNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Simonson v. GrantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  3. Scheid v. LeibshultzIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Thomas v. GumaerNew York Supreme Court · 1831

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gill v. General Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1904
  2. Sanders v. KellerIdaho Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Dawson v. PogueOregon Supreme Court · 1888
  4. General Electric Co. v. GillU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API