Scheid v. Leibshultz
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Dearborn Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBuskirk, J.
The record in this cause ^presents but one question, and that is, whether the court erred in overruling the demurrer to the complaint.
- . This was an action by the appellees.against the appellants, upon the following instrument: “ Know all men by these presents that we, August Thierfelder, of Aurora, Dearborn county and State of Indiana, are hereby held and firmly bound unto Klaas and Leibshultz, sewing machine general '■ ageuts in the city of Cincinnati, State of Ohio, in the sum of one thousand dollars, lawful money of the United States of America, to be paid to the said Klaas and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Smith v. CrookerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1809
- Wild Cat Branch v. BallIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Lufkin v. CurtisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1816
- Grosvenor v. GoldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1812
- Potter v. State ex rel. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Nusbaum v. Hartford Fire Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Woodcock v. UdellSuperior Court of Delaware · 1953
- Supreme Council of the Catholic Benevolent Legion v. BoyleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
- Dodd v. MitchellIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Murray v. People ex rel. Saguache CountySupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.