Legal Opinion

State v. Strohauer

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 20, 1987No. 865SC415PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

During cross-examination of Ms. Strohauer, defendant’s attorney questioned her as to the length of an affair she had with another party. She responded, “I seen him a couple of weeks while my husband was in prison.” The last part of her statement concerning her husband’s criminal record was unresponsive to the question and contained evidence tending to show that defendant had committed a prior offense. The State cannot offer such evidence because it is logically irrelevant to proving the crime with which defendant is currently charged. State v. McClain, 240 N.C. 171, 81 S.E. 2d…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. State v. McClainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. People v. RobideauMichigan Supreme Court · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. PriddyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  2. State v. StrohauerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  3. State v. MessickCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  4. State v. MasseyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  5. State v. CorbettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API