Legal Opinion

Arthur Theiss v. Gordon H. Scherer

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 20, 1968No. 17599_1PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COMBS, Circuit Judge.

The appellant contends that the district judge erred in holding that the complaint in an action for libel did not state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

The claim of libel grows out of a letter which appellee, an attorney, wrote to appellant’s attorney in regard to the administration of an estate. The letter was filed with the complaint and reads:

GORDON H. SCHERER Attorney at Law 1717 Carew Tower Cincinnati, Ohio

July 1, 1964

Mr. George C. Allen

Barbour, Kimpel & Allen

709 Gwynne Building

Cincinnati, Ohio 45202

Dear George:

Beverly Meyer sent me the copy she received of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Robert W. Johnston v. H. G. Cartwright, Kiowa Corporation, Walter Brown and H. G. Cartwright v. Robert W. JohnstonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
  2. Matthis v. KennedySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  3. Parker v. KirklandAppellate Court of Illinois · 1939
  4. Richeson v. KesslerIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Rodgers v. WiseSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. CRIBERG v. RaymondMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  2. Surace v. WuligerOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Russell v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  4. Adams v. PeckCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  5. Converters Equipment Corp. v. Condes Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1977

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API