Legal Opinion
Tweedall v. Fritz
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided December 19, 1997No. EV 97-6 C B/HPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ENTRY GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
BARKER, Chief Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs’ claims that Defendants (1) violated Daniel Tweedall’s (“Tweedall”) Fourteenth Amendment procedural due process rights when they suspended him with pay and constructively discharged him, (2) sexually harassed Tweedall by’ falsely accusing him of sexual harassment, (3) defamed Twee-dall by falsely accusing him of sexual harassment, (4) suspended and constructively discharged Tweedall because of his race, and (5) suspended and…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kleckley v. Milwaukee Public SchoolsDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1998
- Curry v. PulliamDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2002