Legal Opinion
Henzgen v. Henzgen
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 6, 1944No. Civ. 14045PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BISHOP, J. pro tem.
The plaintiff appeals from an order reducing from $120 to $60 the amount which the defendant is required to pay her each month. We find no merit in any of the arguments advanced by the plaintiff in support of her appeal.
An interlocutory decree was entered in this cause on November 19, 1940, followed, on November 28, 1941, by the entry of a final judgment of divorce which adopted by reference the provisions of the decree respecting alimony and those relating to the property of the parties. By these judgments plaintiff obtained a divorce from the defendant, and was awarded…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Puckett v. PuckettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Parker v. ParkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Horton v. HortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Remondino v. RemondinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Meek v. MeekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Herbert v. RiddellDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1952
- Streeter v. StreeterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Kohl v. KohlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Fields v. FieldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Shepard v. ShepardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.