Thomson v. Thomson
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. A. A. Sanderson, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
BRITT, C.
Action for divorce begun April 1, 1895. Plaintiff alleged in his complaint, among other things, “That prior to the first day of February, 1894, the defendant .... willfully and without cause deserted and abandoned the plaintiff, and ever since and still continues so to willfully and without cause desert and abandon said plaintiff, and to live separate and apart from him, without any reason, and against his will and without his •consent.” The defendant did not answer the complaint, or otherwise appear in the action.
In the judgment it was recited that the cause was' heard upon the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Murray v. MurrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
3Cited by6 opinions
- Strupelle v. StrupelleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Sheehan v. All Persons, Etc.California Court of Appeal · 1926
- Crackel v. CrackelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- Lukasik v. LukasikCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Locke v. LockeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.