Legal Opinion

Pinkerton v. Thompson

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 10, 2007No. 06CA008996PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carr, Judge.

{¶ 1} Defendants-appellants and cross-appellees, Robert Thompson and Envelope Mart of Northeast, Ohio, Inc. (“Envelope Mart”), appeal from a jury verdict in the Lorain County Court of Common Pleas. Plaintiff-appellee and cross-appellant, James D. Pinkerton, cross-appeals from the judgments of the trial court, which denied his employment intentional-tort claim and his retaliation claim. This court affirms in part and reverses in part.

I

{¶ 2} On June 4, 1999, Pinkerton injured his left hand and fingers while operating Envelope Mart’s press machine. As a result of the injury,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Village of Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State Ex Rel. Hanson v. Guernsey County Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Van Fossen v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Moss v. Lorain County Board of Mental RetardationOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Dottore v. Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease, L.L.P.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Cashland Fin. Servs., Inc. v. HoytOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Chunyo v. GauntnerOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. Lynch v. GreenwaldOhio Court of Appeals · 2012

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API