Legal Opinion
PIMA Financial Service Corp. v. Intermountain Home Systems, Inc.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided March 10, 1992No. Civ. A. 88-K-176PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
KANE, Senior District Judge.
This is an interpleader action in which the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and the Department of Revenue of the State of Colorado (State) have both asserted an interest in funds held by the stakeholder, the PIMA Financial Service Corporation. The FDIC and the State have filed cross motions for summary judgment, each claiming its interest takes priority. On March 15, 1991, both parties filed a joint stipulation of facts. The FDIC has also moved for leave to submit citations of supplemental authority. That motion is…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. City of New BritainSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Moe v. Confederated Salish & Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead ReservationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Employees of Department of Public Health v. Department of Public HealthSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bank of New England Old Colony, N.A. v. R. Gary Clark, Tax Administrator, for the State of Rhode IslandCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- David Bateman v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Everett N. Dobson & Sons, Inc., Party-In-InterestCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Bank of New England — Old Colony, N.A. v. ClarkDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1992
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. v. White Consolidated Industries Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
- Sunburst Bank v. Executive Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.