Legal Opinion
Sisay v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 31, 1998No. Civ.A. 97-2383(RMU)PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
URBINA, District Judge.
Granting the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment
I. Introduction
This matter comes before the court on the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff Simeon Sisay commenced this action against defendants Greyhound Lines, Inc. (“Greyhound”), Emma Gray, and Ray Robinson alleging national origin discrimination and retaliation in violation of 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e and 12203 (1994), willful discharge, malicious interference with contractual relations, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. 1 Presently, the defendants move for summary…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Love v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Wiley v. JohnsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Nyunt v. TomlinsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Manuel v. PotterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Brown v. Georgetown University Hospital Medstar HealthDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Cornish v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.