Legal Opinion

People v. D.J.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 3, 2010No. A125867PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RUVOLO, P. J.

Appellant contends that the juvenile court’s action in committing him to the Division of Juvenile Justice1 was statutorily unauthorized under Welfare and Institutions Code section 733, subdivision (c) (section 733(c)), because the most recent offense alleged in a petition admitted or found to be true against appellant was not a DJJ-eligible offense—that is, an offense for which DJJ commitment is authorized under Welfare and Institutions Code section 707, subdivision (b) (section 707(b)). We conclude that the last offense alleged in a petition, and admitted by appellant,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. Eddie M.California Supreme Court · 2003

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. Greg F.California Supreme Court · 2012
  2. People v. Morrison, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  3. People v. Greg F.California Supreme Court · 2012
  4. People v. J.M. (In re J.M.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  5. In Re DJCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API