Legal Opinion

Hooe v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 9, 1908No. 28238PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The Reporter’s statement of the case: The following are the facts of the case as found by the court: I. The claimants are residents and citizens of the United States. II.

Read the full summary

The Reporter’s statement of the case: The following are the facts of the case as found by the court: I. The claimants are residents and citizens of the United States. II. The claimants now are and at all the times hereinafter mentioned were the owners of real estate in the city of Washington, D. C., situated on the northwest corner of Eighth and E streets NW., fronting 50 feet on E street and 87-|- feet on Eighth street, together with the building thereon; such building containing 20,173-/^- square feet of floor spaces, which includes 2,039f square feet of floor space in the basement thereof,…

1Opinion of the CourtBarney, J.

This is a suit to recover $9,000 for additional compensation for the use and occupation by the United States Civil Service Commission of the claimants’ office building, situated on the northwest corner of Eighth and E streets NW., in the city of Washington, during the five years beginning August 1, 1900, and ending August 1, 1905.

The facts in the case are as follows: July 10, 1900, the Secretary of the Interior entered into a written lease for said building, exclusive of the basement, for the use of the Civil Service Commission, for the term of eleven months beginning August 1, 1900, and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. BostwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Hawkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. United States v. Child & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1871
  4. De Arnaud v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. Chase v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Freeman Associates Caribbean, Inc. v. Government of the Virgin IslandsDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1983
  2. Authority to Use Funds from Fiscal Year 1990 Appropriation to Cover Shortfall from Prior Award Year's Pell Grant Program, Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API