Legal Opinion
D.M.K., Inc. v. Town of Pittsfield
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided February 28, 2006No. 2005AP221PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCane, C.J.
¶ 1. D.M.K., Inc. appeals a grant of summary judgment in favor of the Town of Pittsfield. As a disappointed bidder for municipal road construction projects, D.M.K. claims that the Town failed to comply with applicable statutes and that the circuit court incorrectly limited the types of damages available. We affirm the circuit court's grant of summary judgment.
FACTS
¶ 2. On May 13, 2003, the Pittsfield town board reviewed bids for several road construction projects. Altogether, there were four projects, referred to as Pineview, Robin, Hillside, and Sunnybrook. During the meeting, the board…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. KruseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
- Aqua-Tech, Inc. v. Como Lake Protection & Rehabilitation DistrictWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Badger State Bank v. TaylorWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Envirologix Corp. v. City of WaukeshaCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
- Glacier State Distribution Services, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Horsfield Materials, Inc. v. City of DyersvilleSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
- Prn Associates LLC v. State of Wisconsin Department of AdministrationWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
- North Twin Builders, LLC v. Town of PhelpsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2011
- PRN Associates LLC v. State of Department of AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2008
- Five Star Airport Alliance, Inc. v. Milwaukee CountyDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2013